Last time I asked one question: can you explain how your AI workflow was designed AND prove it runs the same way every time?
This is the follow-up.
Here’s the uncomfortable part — most workflows that wouldn’t survive a real governance review don’t look ungoverned. They look fine. There’s an approval step. There’s an audit log. Someone wrote a policy doc.
And the thing still does its own quiet thing at run time.
“Governed” isn’t a box you tick once at design time. It’s whether the workflow holds up under the same inputs every time, with a trail that survives a regulator’s questions. A lot of what passes for governance is paperwork sitting next to a system nobody can actually account for.
I wrote up where that gap tends to hide — and how to tell a workflow that looks governed from one that actually is.
Link below. Curious whether this lines up with what you’re running into.
The link to my first post - Before You Let AI Run Your Workflows, Ask Yourself Two Questions