Confusion with Circumstance rule

General
, , ,
1

Hello Community,

I found this question in CSSA 8.5 in PDN

Circumstance.png
Circumstance.png1920×1080 240 KB

So, As per this question, I tried practically in pega and found its not working as per the answer provided by PDN

Here is what i have done -

so i created 3 rulesets 01-01-01, 01-01-02, 01-01-03

  1. I created a section called Login 01-01-01 (initial base rule)

  2. circumstanced it to Login 01-01-02 (.A = 1)

  3. saved as from Login 01-01-01 to Login 01-01-03 , so basically this is nothing but intial base rule

  4. Now when i open the rule form for all three rules, there is (Available,Circumstance) can be seen and circumstance relation between all rules exist

5.I did set .A = 1 in pysetfielddefault Data transform

so when i executed the case type as expected, Login 01-01-02 got executed

Now this is what happened!!!

01-01-01 (none, base rule selected)

01-01-02(.A=1)

01-01-03(None)

  1. To replicate the above question, i checked the base rule checkbox explicitly(base rule selected) for section Login 01-01-01

  2. Now section Login 01-01-02(Available,circumstanced) but there isn’t (Available, circumstance) relation can be seen in rule form for Login 01-01-03 or Login 01-01-01

  3. Now when i tried to execute the case type with .A=1 being set, Login 01-01-03 is getting executed

So rule that rule resolution picking is 01-01-03(none) but as per answer provided in PDN 01-01-02(.A=1) should get picked up.

Can someone please explain wether i got anything wrong.

Thanks,

Mahith