Listening to MSGraph Email Replies in Pega - Limitations with Custom Request Mapping & Attachments

Hello Everyone,

I’ve been working on a fairly specific integration scenario and wanted to share what I’ve found so far - along with some open questions where I’d love to hear from others who’ve tackled this.

The Setup

We’re building a flow where Pega sends an email to an external system from a specific case, with the Case ID embedded in the subject line (e.g., “Re: Policy Verification - Claim-C-123456”). When the external party replies, we need Pega to pick it up and associate it back to that case.

To handle inbound emails, I’ve set up an Email Listener in Pega. Since we’re using Microsoft Graph (MSGraph) rather than a traditional POP3/IMAP source, Pega requires a custom request mapping approach — enabled via the toggle EnableCustomDataAccessForMSGraph on the Service Email rule’s Request tab. The official documentation for this is here:
:backhand_index_pointing_right: Pegasystems Documentation


The Limitation I Hit

Here’s where things get tricky. The custom mapping only supports single-value (scalar) fields of primitive types — Boolean, Integer, and String. That’s fine for flat fields, but the JSON payload coming in from MSGraph looks something like this:

{
  "@odata.context": "https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/...",
  "id": "AAMkAGI2ThEs6AAA=",
  "subject": "Re: Policy Verification - Claim-C-123456",
  "internetMessageId": "<[email protected]>",
  "conversationId": "AAQkAGI2ThEs6CONVERSATION==",
  "receivedDateTime": "2026-06-12T10:30:00Z",
  "hasAttachments": true,
  "from": {
    "emailAddress": {
      "name": "ABC Policy Verifier",
      "address": "[email protected]"
    }
  },
  "toRecipients": [
    {
      "emailAddress": {
        "name": "Tech User",
        "address": "[email protected]"
      }
    }
  ],
  "body": {
    "contentType": "html",
    "content": "ABC Policy Verification Team"
  }
}

Fields like from, toRecipients, and body are nested objects/arrays, which means they cannot be mapped into the Pega clipboard using the custom mapping block. You’re essentially limited to flat fields like id, subject, receivedDateTime, and hasAttachments.


My Current Workaround

The approach I’ve landed on (not ideal, but functional):

  1. In the Custom Mapping block on the Service Email rule’s Request tab, map only the scalar fields (id, subject, receivedDateTime, hasAttachments, etc.)
  2. In the Service Activity or a Data Transform invoked afterward, make a second call to the MSGraph Messages API using the mapped id to retrieve the full message payload — including nested fields and attachments
  3. Parse the full response and process the email body and attachments from there

For attachments specifically, it seems like there’s no escaping a dedicated Graph API call to:

  • Retrieve the base64-encoded attachment stream
  • Decode it
  • Create a Data-WorkAttach-File instance
  • Link it to the case

It works, but it feels like an unnecessary round trip. It would be great if Pega’s custom MSGraph mapping supported nested/complex structures out of the box — one less API call and a much cleaner implementation.


My Questions for the Community

  • Has anyone found a way to map nested MSGraph JSON fields into Pega without making a second API call? Any connector rules or custom parsing tricks?
  • For attachments, is the additional Graph API call truly unavoidable, or is there a smarter pattern others have used?
  • Are there any alternative approaches to the Email Listener setup for MSGraph-sourced emails that offer more flexibility?

Happy to share more specifics about my setup if it helps. Appreciate anyone who takes the time to respond.

Regards

JC

@JayachandraSiddipeta can you describe a bit more on what custom headers you are looking for? Reading the ‘conversationId’ or something else? The reason I ask is because OOTB MSGraph integration supports standard headers already including the attachments so you really should not need an additional logic. When you configure Graph on listener account, the headers work like they do on IMAP/POP3. Your attachments are part of pyAttachmentPage which is a hidden page created in listener context.

Also, your usecase seems closely linked to the ‘Outbound email’ feature of Customer Service(expected to be ported to platform soon). Have you explored that?

Many thanks @VikasRaidhan for your quick reply.

For attachments question, pyAttachmentPage page works. One down.

However, if i want to access the fields like from that is a nested object, using the Message Header block in Service Email request tab with the pre-defined options field names as shown below, I am unable to see it getting set to my clipboard page property .pyInboundEmail like it is setting the body content.

Primarily, I want to access the To, From, Subject, Sent Date, Received Date, Body, Attachments from the incoming email.

Subject, Body, Attachments, ReceivedDateTime are sorted. Only the From is needed now.

Below are some snapshots of service email rule and tracer.

Regards

JC

That is quite surprising. ‘From’ is a standard header and I’ve never seen it not working. OOTB Email channel generates email service automatically and this header has always worked with all protocols including Graph.

Steps to troubleshoot -

  • Enable logger for ‘EmailListener’ class or pxEmailListener
  • This will force headers to be printed on Pega logs
  • See if ‘From’ header is printed.
  • If yes, problem with property mapping on Pega side
  • If not, possible problem with the Graph server connection
  • In any case, raise a support request.

Good news — I’ve managed to narrow down the issue.

After some more digging, I can see the message headers are printing correctly in the logs, so the data is definitely arriving. The problem is further down the chain in how Pega handles it when the MSGraph toggle is enabled.

What’s happening:

When EnableCustomDataAccessForMSGraph is turned on, the standard Message Header parameters are not being set — Pega expects the Custom Data for Graph block to take responsibility for retrieving those headers. But since nested fields can’t be parsed in that block (as I mentioned in my original post), we hit a dead end.

To confirm this, I disabled the MSGraph toggle and added the headers the conventional way — and the mappings started working as expected.

The core problem:

Pega is essentially treating MSGraph-sourced emails differently from IMAP/POP3 sources, but without giving developers the full toolset to compensate. If you opt into the MSGraph custom data path, you lose access to the standard header mappings — and the custom block can’t fill that gap because of the nested field limitation.

What I think needs to happen:

Ideally, even when using the Custom Data for Graph block, developers should still be able to leverage the standard message headers in parallel.

This feels like something that genuinely needs a closer look from the Pega engineering team. I’m going to raise an INC for this and will update the thread with whatever comes out of it.

Regards

JC

Try to use a Datapage in the mapping tab where you are setting subject and id. It should work but you need to find a way to correctly parameterize the DP.

Glad you are able to figure out. Please raise INC. There could be valid reasons why it’s done this way or it could be a genuine miss.