Inquiry - Guided vs Free Form

What’s the argument everyone uses for a customer when it comes to having Guided Journey’s vs Free Form? Does it depend on the use case/the customer?

Guided Journey

  • Customer follows a direct path across the case lifecycle
  • Reduces error to speed up the resolution
  • Ensures compliance and consistency across channels
  • Optimize Pega’s Next Best Action

Free Form Experience

  • Autonomy and speed
  • Reduces friction and user can jump directly into where they need to go
  • Handle cases faster without going through multiple steps

It depends on both the use case and the customer.

I usually position it this way,

  • use Guided Journey when the process needs control, consistency, compliance or support for less experienced users
  • use Free Form when the users are experienced, the path is less predictable and speed/flexibility matters more than step-by-step guidance.

The real decision point for me is if the cost of error is high, go guided, if the cost of friction is high, go free form.

“cost of error” 100% - this is the big driver for me and important discussion with Client.

The flip side, is the cost of trying to control the process - if the client has always had “free form”, trying to hardcode a journey can involve errors and bugs.

Blueprint is a great way of mitigating this but you may want to have a balanced approach between free form and guided journey’s if the client is transitioning. Having been an SME in a long past life, we tried to build guided journey’s - if I had my time again, I would have built in a little more flexibility for those “edge cases”.